“Math is my worst subject,” I often thought growing up. Never was this fact more evident than when my teacher presented me with a word problem. My mother, a veteran middle school math teacher, worked math problems and read Algebra textbooks the way I do books on writing. But the calculus of word problems continued to escape me even into college.
It’s no surprise that word problems intimidate. Having a framework to build problem-solving mastery may make the difference for students like me. I often wished for a simple approach to solving math problems, but my mother, who taught math for many years successfully, never gave me one approach or model. I always wonder, if we offered students one model or approach to use consistently, would that would work? Perhaps like George Polya’s approach or the STRIDE Model, which I will focus on in this blog.
Update: Lynn has made a compelling argument for modifying the STRIDE Model in the comments. I’ve responded with a revised model that seeks to capture the critique in her remarks. I’ve also included the revised version with a new infographic at the end of this blog post. You decide which is the better model, version 1 or version 2. My thanks to my readers for assisting me in learning how to solve math word problems, to leverage comprehension while solving them.
The STRIDE Model v1
The STRIDE Model (Scan, Think, Reflect, Identify, Do, Evaluate) equips learners with systematic steps. It facilitates breaking down problems into steps. The Model aligns itself to schema-based instruction, and critical thinking. Let’s explore how to integrate STRIDE into classrooms with grade-specific activities, templates, and actionable infographics.
Let me know what you think, non-math experts and fellow bewildered word problem-solvers. Does STRIDE work for you?

An Example Solution: The STRIDE Framework
Let’s explore what this might look like below. If you’re a math teacher, I hope you’ll double-check the math and share your thoughts in the comments. Be kind, I’m not a math person and I totally relied on AI for support.

1. Scan the Problem
- Numbers:
- Truck speed = 60 mph,
- Car speed = 66 mph,
- Head start = 13 minutes.
- Key Words: “13 minutes later,” “pass the truck.”
2. Think About Connections
- Relate to real-life highway overtaking.
- Visualize the truck’s head start as a distance gap.
3. Reflect on the Question
- Rephrase: “How long will the car take to close the 13-minute distance gap created by the truck?”
4. Identify a Strategy
Calculate the truck’s head start distance:

Determine the car’s relative speed:

5. Do the Work
Time to catch up:

6. Evaluate Your Answer
Verify both of these items:
a) Truck’s distance after 2.17 hours:

b) Car’s distance:

Digital Templates
Below, you will find a chart that clarifies each stage of the STRIDE strategy, along with some sample ideas for activities. You can find a Canva template link to the STRIDE Model here.
Strategy | Activities | Focus |
---|---|---|
Scan the Problem | Problem dissection worksheets; keyword highlighting in multi-step problems | Circle numbers, underline keywords |
Think About Connections | Drawing diagrams; writing real-life scenarios to contextualize problems | Real-life connections, diagrams |
Reflect on the Question | Rephrasing exercises (individual worksheets and group comparisons) | Goal identification, self-check prompts |
Identify a Strategy | Strategy justification; challenge prediction during planning | Brainstorming, step-by-step planning |
Do the Work | Step-by-step demonstrations (interactive whiteboards); collaborative solving | Showing work, explaining logic |
Give it a go! Try students out on the STRIDE Model, a schema-based framework for solving word problems. You never know, it may assist them as they work to solve problems.
STRIDE Model v2
As promised, here’s the revised model. What do you think? How could it be improved based on your knowledge and experiences?
S – Survey the Situation:
- Read the entire problem carefully to understand the overall story or context. What is happening in the problem?
- Identify all the important information given: What facts or details do you know? (Make sure to include numbers and their units or labels).
- Briefly consider what the problem might be asking you to find or do (you’ll refine this in step R).
T – Think About Connections:
- Connect the problem to what you already know (similar problems, real-world experiences).
- Visualize or draw the situation described in the problem to help build understanding and see relationships between the pieces of information.
R – Reflect on the Question:
- Ask yourself: What specifically is the problem asking me to find or do? What will the answer look like (e.g., a number of apples, a measurement, a comparison)?
- Rephrase the question in your own words to ensure you understand the goal.
I – Identify a Strategy:
- Based on your understanding of the situation and the question, decide what mathematical steps, operations, or procedures will help solve the problem (e.g., addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, drawing a diagram, making a table).
- Consider if there are multiple steps needed. Use tools like graphic organizers or charts if they help plan your approach.
D – Do the Work:
- Carry out your chosen strategy step by step.
- Show your work clearly and write down your reasoning to track your thinking process and make it easier to review. Check calculations as you go.
E – Evaluate Your Answer:
- Check your final answer: Does it make sense in the context of the situation you surveyed in step S? Is the unit appropriate for the question asked in step R?
- Review your steps (D). If the answer seems unreasonable, revisit your understanding (S, T, R) or your strategy (I) and try again.
Revised Infographic for the STRIDE Model v2
Here’s a quick revision featuring the STRIDE Model v2. Be sure to review each step with a critical eye, and remember that I am challenged in both art and math. 🙂

3 comments
Miguel, thanks for acknowledging word problems are a struggle for many! If I could clarify a few things and offer some constructive criticism…while this process is a great attempt to help students slow down and consider the problem before attempting to solve it, identifying ‘key words’ has many faults that research has highlighted. Unfortunately , it is one of those practices that teachers hold on to, not because it works but because it is easy and quick to help students with something that is somewhat complicated. Instead we should be supporting students to first use comprehension strategies: What is the story mostly about? What do we know from the story (not just the numbers but the units also)? What is the problem asking us to solve? Once that thinking is done students have fully understood the context and can move forward with the ‘math’ of the problem. The ‘keyword’ approach seemingly leapfrogs over comprehension and infers that the numbers are the most important part of the word problem. I hope this clarification helps- we need to abandon ‘fast fixes’ and instead encourage sense making in math!
Lynn, thanks so much for taking the time to write. It’s nice to know someone is reading! 🙂
I am also grateful for your thoughtful reframe of the process to focus on the use of comprehension strategies. As I shared in the post, math and word problems continue to be a problem for me that I wrestle with. I’d like to say that I’ve arrived, but the journey remains uncertain and the destination…a blur in the distance.
Let me ask you, would this updated version of the STRIDE Model be closer to what you suggest?
STRIDE Model v2
S – Survey the Situation:
Read the entire problem carefully to understand the overall story or context. What is happening in the problem?
Identify all the important information given: What facts or details do you know? (Make sure to include numbers and their units or labels).
Briefly consider what the problem might be asking you to find or do (you’ll refine this in step R).
T – Think About Connections:
Connect the problem to what you already know (similar problems, real-world experiences).
Visualize or draw the situation described in the problem to help build understanding and see relationships between the pieces of information.
R – Reflect on the Question:
Ask yourself: What specifically is the problem asking me to find or do? What will the answer look like (e.g., a number of apples, a measurement, a comparison)?
Rephrase the question in your own words to ensure you understand the goal.
I – Identify a Strategy:
Based on your understanding of the situation and the question, decide what mathematical steps, operations, or procedures will help solve the problem (e.g., addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, drawing a diagram, making a table).
Consider if there are multiple steps needed. Use tools like graphic organizers or charts if they help plan your approach.
D – Do the Work:
Carry out your chosen strategy step by step.
Show your work clearly and write down your reasoning to track your thinking process and make it easier to review. Check calculations as you go.
E – Evaluate Your Answer:
Check your final answer: Does it make sense in the context of the situation you surveyed in step S? Is the unit appropriate for the question asked in step R?
Review your steps (D). If the answer seems unreasonable, revisit your understanding (S, T, R) or your strategy (I) and try again.
Hi Miguel, it’s so nice to see you revise your thinking based on my comment! These days, it’s refreshing to have positive dialogue online without resorting to negative name-calling or rude defensiveness so thank you! I think the version 2 graphic and explanations accurately capture the nuance of using comprehension strategies first before addressing the mathematics in the problem. ‘Survey the Situation’ is an improvement over ‘Scan the Problem’. I would consider adjusting your ‘Example solution’ of the truck problem with some of this as well and removing the keyword aspect. It might say something like: The story is mostly about a truck and car driving on the same highway but at different speeds. The story tells us the truck is traveling 60 mph and the car enters the highway at 66 mph, 13 minutes later than the truck. The problem we have to solve is how long will it take the car to catch up to the truck on the highway. Also, consider adjusting the first row in your table for each of the steps as well. Thanks again for reframing this concept for educators! In my experience of over 26 years in education and 10 years working with math intervention students, the comprehension of the word problem is one of the ‘key’ ideas to shift towards! (see what I did there? LOL)